2020 Volvo XC90 MPG is between 25 MPG and 131 MPG depending on engine:
The 2020 Volvo XC90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Volvo XC90 MPG is up to 217% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T5 |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
- | 6% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T6 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 B5 |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T8 TwEn |
90
/
131 MPG
(2.6 / 1.8 L per 100 km) |
10.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 217% better |
1678—2423 miles
(2700—3900 km) |
0.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 B5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 TwEn |
Consumption (city / highway) |
90
/
131 MPG
(2.6 / 1.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 10.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 217% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 1678—2423 miles (2700—3900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.4 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Volvo XC90 MPG is between 23 MPG and 118 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Volvo XC90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Volvo XC90 MPG is up to 192% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T6 |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.3 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D5 |
35
/
42 MPG
(6.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T8 |
81
/
118 MPG
(2.9 / 2 L per 100 km) |
9.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 192% better |
1491—2175 miles
(2400—3500 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T5 |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D4 |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.3 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
42 MPG
(6.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
81
/
118 MPG
(2.9 / 2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 9.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 192% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 1491—2175 miles (2400—3500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
34 MPG
(9.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Volvo XC90 MPG is between 12 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Volvo XC90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Volvo XC90 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 V8 |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.2i |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D3 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.4d |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
4.4i |
12
/
25 MPG
(19.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D4 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
25 MPG
(19.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Volvo XC90 MPG is between 13 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Volvo XC90 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Volvo XC90 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 20V |
15
/
25 MPG
(16.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 TDi |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 24V |
13
/
25 MPG
(18.5 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 T6 |
13
/
25 MPG
(18.5 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D3 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 20V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
25 MPG
(16.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
25 MPG
(18.5 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
25 MPG
(18.5 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |