2013 Volvo XC70 MPG is between 16 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Volvo XC70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Volvo XC70 MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 T5 |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D4 |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D4 |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% better |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T5 |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 T6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 T5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Volvo XC70 MPG is between 16 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Volvo XC70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Volvo XC70 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
17
/
30 MPG
(14 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4d |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.4D |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D DRIVe |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
36
/
46 MPG
(6.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 T6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Drive |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D3 |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D3 |
36
/
46 MPG
(6.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
30 MPG
(14 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D DRIVe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
46 MPG
(6.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Drive |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
49 MPG
(6.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
46 MPG
(6.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Volvo XC70 MPG is between 17 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Volvo XC70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Volvo XC70 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 T |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 T |
17
/
35 MPG
(13.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
21
/
35 MPG
(11.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
35 MPG
(13.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
35 MPG
(11.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |