2013 Volvo S80 MPG is between 21 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 T4F |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 D2 |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
808—1181 miles
(1300—1900 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D3 |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
746—1118 miles
(1200—1800 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 T4 |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D4 |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
808—1181 miles
(1300—1900 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T5 |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 T6 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4F |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 D2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1181 miles (1300—1900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1118 miles (1200—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1181 miles (1300—1900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Volvo S80 MPG is between 16 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D3 |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.1 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Drive |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.3 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
28
/
50 MPG
(8.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—932 miles
(800—1500 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 AWD |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 T4 |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 |
18
/
36 MPG
(13.1 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—684 miles
(500—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T5 |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 T4F |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 AWD |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.7 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 T6 AWD |
16
/
32 MPG
(14.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D3 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.1 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Drive |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
59 MPG
(5.3 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
50 MPG
(8.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—932 miles (800—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
36 MPG
(13.1 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—684 miles (500—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 T4F |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
34 MPG
(13.7 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
32 MPG
(14.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Volvo S80 MPG is between 14 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 T |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0F |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 D DRIVE |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—932 miles
(900—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 T6 AWD |
14
/
30 MPG
(17.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D |
26
/
46 MPG
(9.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 |
26
/
47 MPG
(9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D5 AWD |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0F |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 D DRIVE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.6 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—932 miles (900—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 T6 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
30 MPG
(17.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
46 MPG
(9.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
47 MPG
(9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Volvo S80 MPG is between 17 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i T |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 D5 |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 D |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5FT |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 i |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
4.4 i V8 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
4.4 i V8 AWD |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 D5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5FT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 i V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 i V8 AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Volvo S80 MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 20V |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 i 24V Turbo |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—684 miles
(500—1100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 20V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 i 24V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—684 miles (500—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Volvo S80 MPG is between 14 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Volvo S80 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Volvo S80 MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i T |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 20V Turbo |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 20V |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 20V |
21
/
32 MPG
(11 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 TDi |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—994 miles
(900—1600 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 24V |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 20V |
18
/
33 MPG
(13 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i T |
18
/
33 MPG
(13 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TDI |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 24V T6 |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 i 24V |
16
/
28 MPG
(15.1 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
32 MPG
(11 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—994 miles (900—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(13 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(13 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 24V T6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(15.1 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |