cat_logo
HomeVolvo

C70

Volvo C70 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Volvo C70 MPG by Years

Volvo C70 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Volvo C70 MPG

    • average 2006 Volvo C70 MPG: 32 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
    • worst 2006 Volvo C70 MPG: 17 MPG / 14 L per 100 km
    • best 2006 Volvo C70 MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1717 kg / 3786 lbs
    • body type: coupe - cabriolet
    • difference highway / city: 44%
    • average engine power: 129 kW / 176 hp
    • difference from world average: 0%
    • max distance with full tank: 611 miles (984 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

2006 Volvo C70 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2006 Volvo C70 MPG is between 17 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.O D4 — 27 to 46 MPG
  • 2.O D3 — 27 to 46 MPG
  • 2.4 D5 — 27 to 44 MPG
  • 2.0 D — 29 to 44 MPG
  • 2.4 i 20V — 18 to 35 MPG
  • 2.5 i 20V — 18 to 36 MPG
  • 2.6 T5 — 17 to 35 MPG


    2006 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio

    The 2006 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.O D4 — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.O D3 — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 D5 — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 D — 40 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 i 20V — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 i 20V — 64 kg/mpg
  • 2.6 T5 — 69 kg/mpg


    2006 Volvo C70 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2006 Volvo C70 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.O D4 is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.O D3 is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.4 D5 is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 D is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.4 i 20V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 i 20V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.6 T5 is 22% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2006 Volvo C70 Coupe Cabrio II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.O D4 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.O D3 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 D5 27 / 44 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 D 29 / 44 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 i 20V 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 i 20V 18 / 36 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.6 T5 17 / 35 MPG
    (14 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2006 Volvo C70 Coupe Cabrio II MPG

    Vehicle 2.O D4
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.O D3
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 44 MPG
    (8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 44 MPG
    (8.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 i 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 36 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.6 T5
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 35 MPG
    (14 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Volvo C70 MPG

      • average 1998 Volvo C70 MPG: 24 MPG / 11.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1998 Volvo C70 MPG: 14 MPG / 17.1 L per 100 km
      • best 1998 Volvo C70 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1570 kg / 3462 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 47%
      • average engine power: 148 kW / 202 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 423 miles (680 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1998 Volvo C70 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1998 Volvo C70 MPG is between 14 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 20 V — 18 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 20V Turbo — 14 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 20V — 14 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 i T — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.3 20V T-5 — 14 to 27 MPG
  • 2.3 i 20V T5 — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.4 i 20V — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.5 20V Turbo — 15 to 29 MPG


    1998 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1998 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 20 V — 68 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 20V Turbo — 83 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 20V — 83 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i T — 72 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 20V T-5 — 81 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i 20V T5 — 72 kg/mpg
  • 2.4 i 20V — 71 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 20V Turbo — 79 kg/mpg


    1998 Volvo C70 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1998 Volvo C70 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 20 V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 20V Turbo is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 20V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i T is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 20V T-5 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 i 20V T5 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.4 i 20V is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 20V Turbo is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1998 Volvo C70 Convertible MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 20 V 18 / 32 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 20V Turbo 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 20V 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i T 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 20V T-5 14 / 27 MPG
    (17.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i 20V T5 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.4 i 20V 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 20V Turbo 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1998 Volvo C70 Convertible MPG

    Vehicle 2.5 20 V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 32 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 20V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 20V T-5
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 27 MPG
    (17.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i 20V T5
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.4 i 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 20V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Volvo C70 MPG

      • average 1997 Volvo C70 MPG: 24 MPG / 11.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1997 Volvo C70 MPG: 14 MPG / 16.4 L per 100 km
      • best 1997 Volvo C70 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1450 kg / 3197 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 47%
      • average engine power: 144 kW / 195 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 439 miles (707 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1997 Volvo C70 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1997 Volvo C70 MPG is between 14 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 20V Turbo — 14 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 20V — 14 to 28 MPG
  • 2.0 i T — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.3 20V T-5 — 17 to 30 MPG
  • 2.5 20 V — 18 to 32 MPG
  • 2.5 20V T — 15 to 29 MPG


    1997 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1997 Volvo C70 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 20V Turbo — 76 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 20V — 76 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i T — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 20V T-5 — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 20 V — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 20V T — 73 kg/mpg


    1997 Volvo C70 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1997 Volvo C70 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 20V Turbo is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 20V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i T is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 20V T-5 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 20 V is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 20V T is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1997 Volvo C70 Coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 20V Turbo 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 20V 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i T 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 20V T-5 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 20 V 18 / 32 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 20V T 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1997 Volvo C70 Coupe MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 20V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 20V
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 20V T-5
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 30 MPG
    (13.6 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 20 V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 32 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 20V T
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings