1996 Toyota Town Ace MPG is between 26 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Toyota Town Ace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Toyota Town Ace MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 4WD |
26
/
38 MPG
(9.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(9.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Toyota Town Ace MPG is between 19 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Toyota Town Ace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Toyota Town Ace MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 4WD |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TD |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |