2005 Toyota Soarer MPG is between 16 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Toyota Soarer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Toyota Soarer MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 Twin-turbo 24V GT |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| 4.0 i V8 32V GT |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.0i V6 24V GT |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 Twin-turbo 24V GT |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.0 i V8 32V GT |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V GT |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Toyota Soarer MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Toyota Soarer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Toyota Soarer MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 Twin-turbo 24V GT |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 4.0i GPS |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 Twin-turbo 24V GT |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.0i GPS |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
