2018 Toyota Sequoia MPG is 17 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Toyota Sequoia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Toyota Sequoia MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 V8 |
13
/
17 MPG
(18.1 / 13.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
17 MPG
(18.1 / 13.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Toyota Sequoia MPG is 22 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Toyota Sequoia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Toyota Sequoia MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7L V8 |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 5.7L V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Toyota Sequoia MPG is between 10 MPG and 18 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Toyota Sequoia MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Toyota Sequoia MPG is up to 60% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7 V8 32V |
10
/
18 MPG
(23 / 13.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
| 4.7 V8 32V AWD |
10
/
18 MPG
(23 / 13 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.7 V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
18 MPG
(23 / 13.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 60% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 4.7 V8 32V AWD |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
18 MPG
(23 / 13 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 60% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |
