2000 Toyota Previa MPG is between 16 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Toyota Previa MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Toyota Previa MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D-4D |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
- | 41% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Toyota Previa MPG is between 13 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Toyota Previa MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Toyota Previa MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TD |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V 4X4 |
13
/
19 MPG
(18.1 / 12.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V 4X4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
19 MPG
(18.1 / 12.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |