2000 Toyota MR 2 MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2000 Toyota MR 2 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Toyota MR 2 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V VT-i |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V VT-i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Toyota MR 2 MPG is between 13 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Toyota MR 2 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Toyota MR 2 MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
- | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
4.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16 V |
13
/
26 MPG
(18 / 9 L per 100 km) |
- | 47% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
6.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i turbo GT |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
4.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16 V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
26 MPG
(18 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 6.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i turbo GT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.8 L per 100 km / person |