2002 Toyota Mark II MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2002 Toyota Mark II MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Toyota Mark II MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i 24V Turbo |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 24V Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Toyota Mark II MPG is between 12 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Toyota Mark II MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Toyota Mark II MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 24V |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i 24V |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 24V Turbo WT-I |
12
/
20 MPG
(20 / 12 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 24V Turbo WT-I |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
20 MPG
(20 / 12 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Toyota Mark II MPG is between 16 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Toyota Mark II MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Toyota Mark II MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 24V |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 TD |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i 24V |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(15 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Toyota Mark II MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Toyota Mark II MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Toyota Mark II MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i 24V Twin-turbo |
21
/
39 MPG
(10.99 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 24V |
20
/
33 MPG
(12 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 24V 4WD |
19
/
38 MPG
(12.2 / 6.25 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 24V |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i 24V |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V Twin-turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
39 MPG
(10.99 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(12 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 24V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
38 MPG
(12.2 / 6.25 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1984 Toyota Mark II MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The 1984 Toyota Mark II MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Toyota Mark II MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 24V |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |