2017 Land Cruiser Prado (J150 facelift 2017) 5Door
2017 Land Cruiser Prado (J150 facelift 2017) 3Door
2017 Land Cruiser (J200 facelift 2017)
2013 Land Cruiser Prado (J150 facelift 2013)
2013 Land Cruiser (J200 facelift 2013)
2010 Land Cruiser Prado (J150)
2008 Land Cruiser (J200)
2004 Land Cruiser 79 (HZJ79)
2002 Land Cruiser (120) Prado
1998 Land Cruiser 100 J10
1990 Land Cruiser 80
1987 Land Cruiser 90 Prado
1984 Land Cruiser 100 J7
2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 16 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 D-D4 |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 V6 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 D-D4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
The 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 D-4D |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 D-4D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 13 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXL 4.5d V8 |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
VX 4.5d V8 |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
GX 4.5d V8 |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
808—1118 miles
(1300—1800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
5.7 V8 |
13
/
17 MPG
(18.1 / 13.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 V8 |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GXL 4.5d V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | VX 4.5d V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GX 4.5d V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1118 miles (1300—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
17 MPG
(18.1 / 13.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 16 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 D-4D |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 D-4D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 VVT-i |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 V6 Dual VVT-i |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 D-4D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 VVT-i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 Dual VVT-i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 13 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 D-4D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
4.6 V8 |
13
/
22 MPG
(18 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
4.5 V8 |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 D-4D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
22 MPG
(18 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.5 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 16 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 TD |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.4 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(14.7 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 12 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.7i V8 |
12
/
20 MPG
(19 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
-
|
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
4.5D V8 |
20
/
26 MPG
(12 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.7i V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
20 MPG
(19 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.5D V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
26 MPG
(12 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 20 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5TD V8 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
4.2 TD 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.5TD V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 TD 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 13 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 D-4D |
18
/
27 MPG
(12.9 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 V6 |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 D-4D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(12.9 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
22 MPG
(18.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 11 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 TD |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
4.7 V8 32V |
11
/
18 MPG
(21.5 / 13.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.7 V8 32V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
18 MPG
(21.5 / 13.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 11 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 60% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 TD 24V |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.9 / 9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 |
12
/
18 MPG
(20 / 13 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km / person |
4.2 TD |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
4.5 24V |
11
/
17 MPG
(20.5 / 14.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 TD 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.9 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
18 MPG
(20 / 13 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.5 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
17 MPG
(20.5 / 14.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |
1987 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 13 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1987 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1987 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 16V |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 D-4D |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.4 V6 24V |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.6 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 TD |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.2 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.4 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.6 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.2 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1984 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is between 12 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 TD |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
- | 25% worse |
-
|
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 D |
12
/
18 MPG
(20 / 13 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
18 MPG
(20 / 13 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.3 L per 100 km / person |