2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 D-4D |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is 44 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 D-4D |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.4 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 D-4D |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.4 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is between 25 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 D-4D |
25
/
35 MPG
(9.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 3% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.5 D-4D |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
35 MPG
(9.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 D-4D |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 0% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 D-4D |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 0% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 D-4D |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 0% |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.5 D-4D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Toyota Hilux MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
The 1989 Toyota Hilux MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Toyota Hilux MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.0 D |
26
/
37 MPG
(8.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
-
|
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.0 D |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(8.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
