2020 Toyota Highlander MPG is between 20 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2020 Toyota Highlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Toyota Highlander MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
35
/
35 MPG
(6.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
621—621 miles
(1000—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
35 MPG
(6.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—621 miles (1000—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Toyota Highlander MPG is between 20 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Toyota Highlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Toyota Highlander MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Toyota Highlander MPG is between 18 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Toyota Highlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Toyota Highlander MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
27
/
28 MPG
(8.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.7 |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
28 MPG
(8.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Toyota Highlander MPG is between 18 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Toyota Highlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Toyota Highlander MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
25
/
27 MPG
(9.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—497 miles
(800—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
25
/
27 MPG
(9.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—497 miles
(800—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
27 MPG
(9.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—497 miles (800—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
27 MPG
(9.4 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—497 miles (800—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Toyota Highlander MPG is between 18 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Toyota Highlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Toyota Highlander MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V 4WD |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Limited |
18
/
22 MPG
(13.1 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 24V |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 24V 4WD |
18
/
24 MPG
(13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 i V6 24V Hybrid |
27
/
31 MPG
(8.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Limited |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
22 MPG
(13.1 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
24 MPG
(13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V Hybrid |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
31 MPG
(8.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |