2017 Toyota Harrier MPG is between 26 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Toyota Harrier MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Toyota Harrier MPG is up to 60% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.3 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Toyota Harrier MPG is between 31 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Toyota Harrier MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Toyota Harrier MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
684—994 miles
(1100—1600 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—994 miles (1100—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Toyota Harrier MPG is between 16 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Toyota Harrier MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Toyota Harrier MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 24V |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.5 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Toyota Harrier MPG is between 19 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Toyota Harrier MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Toyota Harrier MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.5 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Toyota Harrier MPG is between 18 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Toyota Harrier MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Toyota Harrier MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i 16V |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.5 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
24 MPG
(12.4 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |