1996 Toyota Corona MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
The 1996 Toyota Corona MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Toyota Corona MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Toyota Corona MPG is between 28 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Toyota Corona MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Toyota Corona MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V EX |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V EX |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V EX |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V 4WS TR-R |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V TR-G |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V EX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V EX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V EX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V 4WS TR-R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V TR-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Toyota Corona MPG is between 29 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Toyota Corona MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Toyota Corona MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
29
/
57 MPG
(8.2 / 4.12 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—932 miles
(700—1500 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
57 MPG
(8.2 / 4.12 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—932 miles (700—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Toyota Corona MPG is between 29 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Toyota Corona MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Toyota Corona MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
29
/
55 MPG
(8.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—870 miles
(700—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
29
/
55 MPG
(8.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—870 miles
(700—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
55 MPG
(8.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—870 miles (700—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
55 MPG
(8.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—870 miles (700—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |