2018 Camry VIII (XV70)
2015 Camry VII (XV50, facelift 2014)
2012 Camry VII (XV50)
2010 Camry VI (XV40, facelift 2009)
2007 Camry VI (XV40)
2007 Camry Solara II (facelift 2006)
2007 Camry Solara II Convertible (facelift 2006)
2005 Camry V (XV30, facelift 2005)
2004 Camry Solara II Convertible
2004 Camry Solara II
2002 Camry V (XV30)
2001 Camry Solara I Convertible (Mark V, facelift 2001)
2001 Camry Solara I (Mark V, facelift 2001)
2000 Camry IV (XV20, facelift 2000)
1999 Camry Solara I (Mark V)
1999 Camry Solara I Convertible (Mark V)
1996 Camry IV (XV20)
1992 Camry III Wagon (XV10)
1991 Camry III (XV10)
1986 Camry II (V20)
1983 Camry I (V10)
2018 Toyota Camry MPG is between 22 MPG and 69 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
-
|
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Toyota Camry MPG is between 21 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
41
/
39 MPG
(5.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
684—684 miles
(1100—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(10 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
39 MPG
(5.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—684 miles (1100—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Camry MPG is between 21 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
44
/
39 MPG
(5.4 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
746—684 miles
(1200—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
39 MPG
(5.4 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—684 miles (1200—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Toyota Camry MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
33
/
34 MPG
(7.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—559 miles
(900—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
34 MPG
(7.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—559 miles (900—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Toyota Camry MPG is between 22 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i 16V |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.5i V6 |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.7 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
41
/
41 MPG
(5.7 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
684—684 miles
(1100—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.7 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
41 MPG
(5.7 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—684 miles (1100—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Toyota Camry MPG is between 21 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Toyota Camry MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2007 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Toyota Camry MPG is between 20 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Toyota Camry MPG is between 23 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.3 V6 |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 16V |
23
/
32 MPG
(10.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
32 MPG
(10.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Toyota Camry MPG is between 20 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.7 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Toyota Camry MPG is between 20 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Toyota Camry MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 2001 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Toyota Camry MPG is between 20 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 24V |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Toyota Camry MPG is between 21 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Toyota Camry MPG is between 21 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Toyota Camry MPG is between 19 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 24V |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Toyota Camry MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 1996 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
15
/
27 MPG
(16.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
27 MPG
(16.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Toyota Camry MPG is between 20 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Toyota Camry MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 1991 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1986 Toyota Camry MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
The 1986 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1986 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1983 Toyota Camry MPG is 44 MPG on engine:
The 1983 Toyota Camry MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1983 Toyota Camry MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 LE |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 LE |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |