2015 Avensis III Wagon (facelift 2015)
2015 Avensis III (facelift 2015)
2012 Avensis III (facelift 2012)
2012 Avensis III Wagon (facelift 2012)
2009 Avensis III
2009 Avensis III Wagon
2003 Avensis II
2003 Avensis II Wagon
2003 Avensis II Hatch
2001 Avensis Verso
1997 Avensis (T22)
1997 Avensis Hatch (T22)
1997 Avensis Wagon (T22)
2015 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 27 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2015 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 19% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Valvematic |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Valvematic |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 D-4D |
46
/
64 MPG
(5.1 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 75% better |
746—994 miles
(1200—1600 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
- | 60% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
46 MPG
(8.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
46
/
64 MPG
(5.1 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—994 miles (1200—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 28 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2015 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Valvematic |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 D-4D |
46
/
65 MPG
(5.1 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 75% better |
746—1056 miles
(1200—1700 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Valvematic |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 19% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.7 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 63% better |
684—994 miles
(1100—1600 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
46
/
65 MPG
(5.1 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1056 miles (1200—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.7 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—994 miles (1100—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 26 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 Valvematic |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Valvematic |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Valvematic |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-CAT |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
34
/
52 MPG
(7 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
52 MPG
(7 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 26 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 Valvematic |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
-
|
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Valvematic |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
-
|
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Valvematic |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
-
|
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-CAT |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
-
|
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
34
/
52 MPG
(7 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
-
|
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Valvematic |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
52 MPG
(7 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 26 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-CAT |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 26 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-CAT |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 17 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 VVT-i |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4 |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
37
/
55 MPG
(6.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V D-4 |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
55 MPG
(6.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V D-4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 17 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 VVT-i |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4 |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D-4D |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 44% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V D-4 |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V D-4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 18 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT-i |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 VVT-i |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4 |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT-i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVT-i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 19 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 19 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
48 MPG
(7.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is between 19 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Toyota Avensis MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.1 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D-4D |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.1 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |