2016 Toyota 86 MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Toyota 86 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Toyota 86 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 |
24
/
32 MPG
(9.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
32 MPG
(9.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Toyota 86 MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Toyota 86 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Toyota 86 MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D-4S |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4S |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |