2019 Suzuki Vitara MPG is between 34 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Suzuki Vitara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Suzuki Vitara MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 BOOSTERJET |
34
/
43 MPG
(7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 BOOSTERJET |
36
/
45 MPG
(6.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 BOOSTERJET |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
43 MPG
(7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 BOOSTERJET |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
45 MPG
(6.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Suzuki Vitara MPG is between 35 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Suzuki Vitara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Suzuki Vitara MPG is up to 84% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VVT |
35
/
46 MPG
(6.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 DDiS |
51
/
64 MPG
(4.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 84% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 DDIS |
50
/
59 MPG
(4.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 BOOSTERJET |
37
/
47 MPG
(6.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 VVT |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
46 MPG
(6.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 DDiS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
51
/
64 MPG
(4.6 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 84% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 DDIS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
59 MPG
(4.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 BOOSTERJET |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
47 MPG
(6.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG is between 20 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDI |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i V6 24V |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
25
/
32 MPG
(9.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TDI |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 25% worse |
-
|
- |
2.0 TD |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
32 MPG
(9.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG is between 20 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Suzuki Vitara MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |