2017 Suzuki Swift MPG is between 34 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Suzuki Swift MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Suzuki Swift MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 |
37
/
55 MPG
(6.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
40
/
55 MPG
(5.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 DUALJET |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.4 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 BOOSTERJET |
49
/
59 MPG
(4.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
497—559 miles
(800—900 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 1.4 |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
55 MPG
(6.4 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
55 MPG
(5.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 DUALJET |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
64 MPG
(5.4 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 BOOSTERJET |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
59 MPG
(4.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—559 miles (800—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Suzuki Swift MPG is between 28 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Suzuki Swift MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Suzuki Swift MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
35
/
48 MPG
(6.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 1.6 |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
48 MPG
(6.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Suzuki Swift MPG is between 35 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Suzuki Swift MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Suzuki Swift MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 5MT |
39
/
53 MPG
(6.1 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 DDiS |
46
/
65 MPG
(5.1 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 4AT |
35
/
48 MPG
(6.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 5MT |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
53 MPG
(6.1 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 DDiS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
46
/
65 MPG
(5.1 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 4AT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
48 MPG
(6.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Suzuki Swift MPG is between 26 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Suzuki Swift MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Suzuki Swift MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 i 16V |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.3i 4WD |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 DDiS |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3i 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.5 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 DDiS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |