2018 Subaru XV MPG is between 30 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Subaru XV MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Subaru XV MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 e-Boxer |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-Boxer |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Subaru XV MPG is between 28 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2016 Subaru XV MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Subaru XV MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0d |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.8 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.8 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Subaru XV MPG is between 27 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Subaru XV MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Subaru XV MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0D |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0DL |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0DL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
47 MPG
(6.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |