2020 Subaru Outback MPG is between 23 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2020 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT 2.4Turbo |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
26
/
33 MPG
(9 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XT 2.4Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
33 MPG
(9 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Subaru Outback MPG is between 17 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
26
/
37 MPG
(8.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
R 3.6 |
17
/
22 MPG
(14.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
-
|
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(8.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | R 3.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
22 MPG
(14.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Subaru Outback MPG is between 27 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 2015 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 31% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
- | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Subaru Outback MPG is between 23 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Subaru Outback MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
22
/
29 MPG
(10.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
29 MPG
(10.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Subaru Outback MPG is between 18 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 T AWD |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i Automatic 4WD |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
-
|
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i MT 4WD |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.6 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
-
|
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0R 4WD |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 T AWD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
25 MPG
(12.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i Automatic 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i MT 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(11.6 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0R 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Subaru Outback MPG is between 17 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 i 4WD |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i 4WD |
17
/
31 MPG
(14 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.3 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Subaru Outback MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Subaru Outback MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Subaru Outback MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i 4WD |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |