2017 Impreza V Sedan
2017 Impreza V Hatchback
2015 Impreza IV Hatchback (facelift 2015)
2015 Impreza IV Sedan (facelift 2015)
2012 Impreza IV Hatchback
2012 Impreza IV Sedan
2008 Impreza III Hatchback
2008 Impreza III Sedan
2001 Impreza II Station Wagon
2001 Impreza II
1995 Impreza I Coupe (GFC)
1993 Impreza I Station Wagon (GF)
1993 Impreza I (GC)
2017 Subaru Impreza MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2017 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 0% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 28 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.4 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.4 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 26 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
26
/
41 MPG
(9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Subaru Impreza MPG is 40 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
26
/
40 MPG
(9.2 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(9.2 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 22 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i sport |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i sport |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 22 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i sport |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i sport |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 17 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.5 |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
R 1.5 |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.8 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0R |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
WRX STI 2.5 |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | R 1.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.8 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 16 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRX 2.5 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5R |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0R |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.1 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
WRX STI 2.5 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.3 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.4 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.1 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.3 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 14 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.0 16V |
17
/
30 MPG
(14.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.0i 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
WRX STi 2.0 16V |
14
/
25 MPG
(16.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.5 Turbo |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
30 MPG
(14.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(16.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 14 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 16V |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.0i 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
RS 2.5i 16V |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
WRX STI 2.5 Turbo |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
WRX 2.5 Turbo |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
WRX STi 2.0 16V |
14
/
25 MPG
(16.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | RS 2.5i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(16.7 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 14 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
22
/
28 MPG
(10.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
14
/
24 MPG
(17 / 10 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i 16V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
28 MPG
(10.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(17 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 17 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 Turbo |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i Turbo |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Subaru Impreza MPG is between 17 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Subaru Impreza MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Subaru Impreza MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 Turbo |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(13.7 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |