2019 Subaru Forester MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2019 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 3% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Subaru Forester MPG is between 21 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 2.0 T |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0d |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.1 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Trend 2.0i |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 2.0d |
31
/
43 MPG
(7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Platinum 2.0i |
28
/
38 MPG
(8.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.1 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Trend 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
43 MPG
(7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Platinum 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
38 MPG
(8.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Subaru Forester MPG is between 21 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Subaru Forester MPG is between 27 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
-
|
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
-
|
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Subaru Forester MPG is between 16 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0X |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.3 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5XS |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5XT |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0TD XS EC-VQ |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0X |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.3 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5XS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5XT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
28 MPG
(14.7 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0TD XS EC-VQ |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Subaru Forester MPG is between 16 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.3 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 X |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 XT |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i 16V Turbo |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.3 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 X |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 XT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Subaru Forester MPG is between 18 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Subaru Forester MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Subaru Forester MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 S -Turbo |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 4WD |
21
/
27 MPG
(11.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S -Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
27 MPG
(11.2 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |