2019 SsangYong Musso MPG is 31 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2019 SsangYong Musso MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 e-XDi |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2018 SsangYong Musso MPG is between 18 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 SsangYong Musso MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 SsangYong Musso MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 e-XDi |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 e-XGDi |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-XGDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(13.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1993 SsangYong Musso MPG is between 13 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 SsangYong Musso MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 SsangYong Musso MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TD |
17
/
31 MPG
(14 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.4 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
20
/
30 MPG
(11.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 TD |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.3 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 D |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 i 24V |
13
/
18 MPG
(18.5 / 13.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.4 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
30 MPG
(11.9 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.3 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
18 MPG
(18.5 / 13.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |