2019 SsangYong Korando MPG is between 22 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 T-GDI |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6d |
31
/
41 MPG
(7.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 T-GDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.7 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
41 MPG
(7.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2017 SsangYong Korando MPG is between 23 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 e-XGi |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 e-XDi |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-XGi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2014 SsangYong Korando MPG is between 24 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 e-XDi |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 e-XGi |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 e-XDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 e-XGi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
38 MPG
(9.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2010 SsangYong Korando MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2010 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDI |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1996 SsangYong Korando MPG is between 14 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 i 24V |
14
/
23 MPG
(16.8 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.1 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 D |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 TD |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.1 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 TD |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 i 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
23 MPG
(16.8 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(17.1 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.1 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
29 MPG
(12.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1983 SsangYong Korando MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 1983 SsangYong Korando MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1983 SsangYong Korando MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 D |
17
/
24 MPG
(14 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(14 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |