2012 Seat Toledo MPG is between 29 MPG and 69 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Seat Toledo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Seat Toledo MPG is up to 88% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI |
36
/
53 MPG
(6.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 TSI |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TDI |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 88% better |
684—994 miles
(1100—1600 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 TSI |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.4 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
53 MPG
(6.5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 88% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—994 miles (1100—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 TSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.4 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.1 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Seat Toledo MPG is between 19 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Seat Toledo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Seat Toledo MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 TSI |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TDI |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.8 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 FSI |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDI |
29
/
45 MPG
(8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 TSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.8 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 FSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Seat Toledo MPG is between 18 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Seat Toledo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Seat Toledo MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 20V |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 20VT |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TDI |
33
/
55 MPG
(7.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 V5 |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 20V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 20VT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
55 MPG
(7.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 V5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(13.2 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Seat Toledo MPG is between 21 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Seat Toledo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Seat Toledo MPG is up to 53% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 MPi |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TDI |
42
/
55 MPG
(5.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 MPi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
55 MPG
(5.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |