2000 Seat Arosa MPG is between 25 MPG and 87 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Seat Arosa MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Seat Arosa MPG is up to 132% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TDI 3L |
65
/
87 MPG
(3.6 / 2.7 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 132% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 16V |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 TDI |
42
/
67 MPG
(5.6 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 TDI 3L |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
65
/
87 MPG
(3.6 / 2.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 132% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
67 MPG
(5.6 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Seat Arosa MPG is between 28 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Seat Arosa MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Seat Arosa MPG is up to 53% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 SDI |
40
/
65 MPG
(5.9 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
48 MPG
(8.5 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
50 MPG
(7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 SDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
65 MPG
(5.9 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |