1986 Saab 9000 MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1986 Saab 9000 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1986 Saab 9000 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 -16 Turbo |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 - 16 Turbo CD |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 - 16 Turbo |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 - 16 CD |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 -16 Turbo |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 CDE |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 -16 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.5 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 -16 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1985 Saab 9000 MPG is between 22 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1985 Saab 9000 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1985 Saab 9000 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 - 16 CS |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 - 16 ND Turbo |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 CSE |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 CS Aero |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 CS |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CSE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 CS Aero |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |