2010 Saab 9-5 MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Saab 9-5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Saab 9-5 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8i V6 |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Saab 9-5 MPG is between 22 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Saab 9-5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Saab 9-5 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDi |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 t |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 TiD |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 t |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 TiD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Saab 9-5 MPG is between 18 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Saab 9-5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Saab 9-5 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 t |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TDi |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 T |
18
/
35 MPG
(12.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 TiD |
24
/
29 MPG
(10 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 t |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
35 MPG
(12.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 TiD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
29 MPG
(10 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Saab 9-5 MPG is between 14 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Saab 9-5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Saab 9-5 MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i T SE |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 T 16V Aero |
16
/
35 MPG
(14.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3i T |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 T |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T 16V |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3i T SE |
15
/
30 MPG
(15.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 T 16V |
15
/
33 MPG
(15.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.3 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i T SE |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 T 16V Aero |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
35 MPG
(14.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3i T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
32 MPG
(13.5 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3i T SE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
30 MPG
(15.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 T 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
33 MPG
(15.3 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
29 MPG
(16.3 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Saab 9-5 MPG is between 14 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Saab 9-5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Saab 9-5 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 T |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 T |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
14
/
29 MPG
(17 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
29 MPG
(17 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |