cat_logo
HomeSaab

9-3

Saab 9-3 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Saab 9-3 MPG by Years

Saab 9-3 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

    • average 2008 Saab 9-3 MPG: 28 MPG / 9.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 2008 Saab 9-3 MPG: 16 MPG / 14.4 L per 100 km
    • best 2008 Saab 9-3 MPG: 52 MPG / 4.5 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1555 kg / 3429 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 45%
    • average engine power: 154 kW / 209 hp
    • difference from world average: 13% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 688 miles (1107 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2008 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2008 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 16 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 t Biopower — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 1.9 TTiD — 31 to 52 MPG
  • 2.0 t Biopower — 16 to 30 MPG
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 17 to 28 MPG


    2008 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 2008 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 t Biopower — 58 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TTiD — 36 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 t Biopower — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 74 kg/mpg


    2008 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2008 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 t Biopower is 22% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TTiD is 31% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 t Biopower is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 i V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2008 Saab 9-3 Sedan II (E) (facelift 2008) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 t Biopower 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TTiD 31 / 52 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 t Biopower 16 / 30 MPG
    (14.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 i V6 24V 17 / 28 MPG
    (14.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2008 Saab 9-3 Sedan II (E) (facelift 2008) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 t Biopower
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TTiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 52 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 t Biopower
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 30 MPG
    (14.4 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 28 MPG
    (14.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

      • average 2005 Saab 9-3 MPG: 26 MPG / 10.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Saab 9-3 MPG: 13 MPG / 18.6 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Saab 9-3 MPG: 49 MPG / 4.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1570 kg / 3462 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 49%
      • average engine power: 145 kW / 197 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 611 miles (984 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 13 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 i 16V — 18 to 36 MPG
  • 1.9 TiD — 30 to 49 MPG
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio — 14 to 27 MPG
  • 1.9 TTiD — 24 to 45 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio — 14 to 26 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V t — 16 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V T — 16 to 30 MPG
  • 2.8 i V6 — 13 to 31 MPG
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 14 to 32 MPG


    2005 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 i 16V — 54 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TiD — 41 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio — 70 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TTiD — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio — 77 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V t — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V T — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 i V6 — 79 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 75 kg/mpg


    2005 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 i 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TiD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio is 37% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TTiD is 6% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V t is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V T is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 i V6 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 i V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Saab 9-3 Sport Combi II (E) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 i 16V 18 / 36 MPG
    (13 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TiD 30 / 49 MPG
    (7.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 i 16V Bio 14 / 27 MPG
    (16.9 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TTiD 24 / 45 MPG
    (9.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 373—746 miles
    (600—1200 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V Bio 14 / 26 MPG
    (17.3 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V t 16 / 34 MPG
    (14.7 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V T 16 / 30 MPG
    (14.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 i V6 13 / 31 MPG
    (18.6 / 7.7 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 186—497 miles
    (300—800 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 i V6 24V 14 / 32 MPG
    (17.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Saab 9-3 Sport Combi II (E) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 36 MPG
    (13 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 49 MPG
    (7.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V Bio
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 27 MPG
    (16.9 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TTiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 45 MPG
    (9.7 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—746 miles (600—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V Bio
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 26 MPG
    (17.3 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V t
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 34 MPG
    (14.7 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V T
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 30 MPG
    (14.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 31 MPG
    (18.6 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—497 miles (300—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 32 MPG
    (17.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

      • average 2004 Saab 9-3 MPG: 26 MPG / 9.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 2004 Saab 9-3 MPG: 18 MPG / 13.1 L per 100 km
      • best 2004 Saab 9-3 MPG: 33 MPG / 7.2 L per 100 km
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 156 kW / 212 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 428 miles (689 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2004 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2004 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 18 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 t — 18 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 T — 23 to 33 MPG
  • 2.8 V6 Turbo — 19 to 28 MPG


    2004 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 2004 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 t — 66 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 T — 61 kg/mpg


    2004 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2004 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 t is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 T is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.8 V6 Turbo is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2004 Saab 9-3 Cabriolet II (E) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 t 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.7 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 T 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 V6 Turbo 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		- 31% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2004 Saab 9-3 Cabriolet II (E) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 t
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.1 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 33 MPG
    (10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

      • average 2003 Saab 9-3 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 2003 Saab 9-3 MPG: 14 MPG / 16.9 L per 100 km
      • best 2003 Saab 9-3 MPG: 48 MPG / 4.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1555 kg / 3429 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 45%
      • average engine power: 124 kW / 169 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 611 miles (984 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2003 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2003 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 14 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.8 i 16V — 22 to 38 MPG
  • 1.9 TiD — 31 to 48 MPG
  • 2.0 i 16V t — 16 to 33 MPG
  • 2.0 t — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 2.0 T — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 2.2 TiD — 26 to 45 MPG
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 14 to 33 MPG


    2003 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 2003 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.8 i 16V — 49 kg/mpg
  • 1.9 TiD — 41 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i 16V t — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 t — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 T — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 TiD — 44 kg/mpg
  • 2.8 i V6 24V — 82 kg/mpg


    2003 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2003 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 1.8 i 16V is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TiD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 i 16V t is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 t is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 T is 22% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 TiD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.8 i V6 24V is 41% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2003 Saab 9-3 Sedan II (E) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.8 i 16V 22 / 38 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TiD 31 / 48 MPG
    (7.7 / 4.9 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 16V t 16 / 33 MPG
    (14.9 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 t 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 T 17 / 33 MPG
    (14 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 TiD 26 / 45 MPG
    (9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.8 i V6 24V 14 / 33 MPG
    (16.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2003 Saab 9-3 Sedan II (E) MPG

    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 38 MPG
    (10.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 48 MPG
    (7.7 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V t
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 33 MPG
    (14.9 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 t
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (14 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 TiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 45 MPG
    (9 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 33 MPG
    (16.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

      • average 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 26 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 15 MPG / 15.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1380 kg / 3043 lbs
      • body type: hatchback
      • difference highway / city: 45%
      • average engine power: 124 kW / 169 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 661 miles (1063 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 15 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 T — 17 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0i — 18 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0i SE — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 i T — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.0 i T SE — 15 to 29 MPG
  • 2.0 i TS — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 2.2 TiD — 32 to 46 MPG
  • 2.3 i T SE — 16 to 31 MPG
  • 2.3 i — 18 to 33 MPG
  • 2.3 T — 17 to 33 MPG


    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 T — 60 kg/mpg
  • 2.0i — 54 kg/mpg
  • 2.0i SE — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i T — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i T SE — 72 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i TS — 62 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 TiD — 42 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i T SE — 68 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i — 57 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 T — 63 kg/mpg


    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 T is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.0i is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0i SE is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i T is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i T SE is 37% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i TS is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 TiD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.3 i T SE is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 i is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 T is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Saab 9-3 I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 T 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0i 18 / 34 MPG
    (13.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0i SE 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i T 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i T SE 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i TS 17 / 32 MPG
    (14 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 TiD 32 / 46 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i T SE 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 T 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Saab 9-3 I MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 34 MPG
    (13.1 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0i SE
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i T SE
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i TS
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (14 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 TiD
    Consumption (city / highway) 32 / 46 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i T SE
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Saab 9-3 MPG

      • average 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 25 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 16 MPG / 14.8 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: 34 MPG / 6.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1600 kg / 3528 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 49%
      • average engine power: 135 kW / 184 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 414 miles (667 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 T — 17 to 34 MPG
  • 2.3 T — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 2.3i — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 2.3 i SE — 16 to 31 MPG


    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 T — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 T — 67 kg/mpg
  • 2.3i — 61 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 i SE — 76 kg/mpg


    1999 Saab 9-3 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Saab 9-3 MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 T is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 T is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.3i is 28% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 i SE is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Saab 9-3 Cabriolet I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 T 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 T 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.3i 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 i SE 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Saab 9-3 Cabriolet I MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.5 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.5 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 i SE
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings