2018 RUF CTR MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2018 RUF CTR MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 RUF CTR MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
-
|
6.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 6.4 L per 100 km / person |
2007 RUF CTR MPG is 22 MPG on engine:
The 2007 RUF CTR MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 RUF CTR MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clubsport 3.8 |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
-
|
6.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Clubsport 3.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.5 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 6.8 L per 100 km / person |