Rover Montego MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Rover Montego MPG by Years

- average 1984 Rover Montego MPG: 37 MPG / 6.9 L per 100 km
- worst 1984 Rover Montego MPG: 22 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
- best 1984 Rover Montego MPG: 62 MPG / 3.8 L per 100 km
- body weight: 1135 kg / 2503 lbs
- body type: sedan
- difference highway / city: 40%
- average engine power: 67 kW / 91 hp
- difference from world average: 16% better
- max distance with full tank: 565 miles (909 km)
- Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

1984 Rover Montego MPG is between 22 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:

1.3 — 30 to 49 MPG

1.6 — 26 to 46 MPG

2.0 — 24 to 42 MPG

2.0 i — 22 to 38 MPG

2.0 TD — 41 to 62 MPG

The 1984 Rover Montego MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

1.3 — 31 kg/mpg

1.6 — 31 kg/mpg

2.0 i — 38 kg/mpg

2.0 TD — 26 kg/mpg

We calculated that 1984 Rover Montego MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.

1.3 is 9% more economical than average car

1.6 is 9% more economical than average car

2.0 is 3% less economical than average car

2.0 i is 9% less economical than average car

2.0 TD is 34% more economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
1.3	30 / 49 MPG (7.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km)	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg	9% better	373—621 miles (600—1000 km)	1.4 L per 100 km / person
1.6	26 / 46 MPG (9.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km)	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg	9% better	311—621 miles (500—1000 km)	1.4 L per 100 km / person
2.0	24 / 42 MPG (10 / 5.6 L per 100 km)	-	3% worse	311—559 miles (500—900 km)	1.5 L per 100 km / person
2.0 i	22 / 38 MPG (10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km)	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg	9% worse	311—497 miles (500—800 km)	1.6 L per 100 km / person
2.0 TD	41 / 62 MPG (5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km)	2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg	34% better	559—808 miles (900—1300 km)	1.1 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	1.3
Consumption (city / highway)	30 / 49 MPG (7.8 / 4.8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	9% better
Driving range (full tank)	373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.4 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.6
Consumption (city / highway)	26 / 46 MPG (9.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	9% better
Driving range (full tank)	311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.4 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0
Consumption (city / highway)	24 / 42 MPG (10 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	-
Difference from world average consumption	3% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—559 miles (500—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.5 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0 i
Consumption (city / highway)	22 / 38 MPG (10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	9% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—497 miles (500—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.6 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0 TD
Consumption (city / highway)	41 / 62 MPG (5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	34% better
Driving range (full tank)	559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.1 L per 100 km / person