1992 Rover 800 MPG is between 19 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Rover 800 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
820i |
20
/
40 MPG
(11.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
820 i Turbo |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
820 Ti |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
825 SD |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
825 Si |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
827 24V |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
40 MPG
(11.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 i Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 Ti |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 825 SD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 825 Si |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 827 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Rover 800 MPG is between 18 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Rover 800 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
825 Si |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
820 Ti |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 825 Si |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(13.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 Ti |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1986 Rover 800 MPG is between 19 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1986 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1986 Rover 800 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
827 SI/Sterling |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
820 16 V I/SI |
21
/
39 MPG
(11.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
820 16V Turbo |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
820 I/SI |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
825 D/SD |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
825 Si Lux |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 827 SI/Sterling |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 16 V I/SI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
39 MPG
(11.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 820 I/SI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 825 D/SD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 825 Si Lux |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |