Rover 800 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Rover 800 MPG by Years

Rover 800 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Rover 800 MPG

    • average 1992 Rover 800 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.7 L per 100 km
    • worst 1992 Rover 800 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
    • best 1992 Rover 800 MPG: 48 MPG / 4.9 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1450 kg / 3197 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 39%
    • average engine power: 120 kW / 163 hp
    • difference from world average: 9% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 661 miles (1063 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

1992 Rover 800 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1992 Rover 800 MPG is between 19 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:

  • 820i — 20 to 40 MPG
  • 820 i Turbo — 19 to 36 MPG
  • 820 Ti — 20 to 31 MPG
  • 825 SD — 29 to 48 MPG
  • 825 Si — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 827 24V — 20 to 29 MPG

    1992 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1992 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 820i — 42 kg/mpg
  • 820 i Turbo — 48 kg/mpg
  • 820 Ti — 56 kg/mpg
  • 825 SD — 39 kg/mpg
  • 825 Si — 52 kg/mpg
  • 827 24V — 63 kg/mpg

    1992 Rover 800 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1992 Rover 800 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 820i is 0% more economical than average car
  • 820 i Turbo is 9% less economical than average car
  • 820 Ti is 25% less economical than average car
  • 825 SD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 825 Si is 16% less economical than average car
  • 827 24V is 28% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 1992 Rover 800 Coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    820i 20 / 40 MPG
    (11.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 373—746 miles
    (600—1200 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    820 i Turbo 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    820 Ti 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person
    825 SD 29 / 48 MPG
    (8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    825 Si 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    827 24V 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)
    2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1992 Rover 800 Coupe MPG

    Vehicle 820i
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 40 MPG
    (11.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—746 miles (600—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 i Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 Ti
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 825 SD
    Consumption (city / highway) 29 / 48 MPG
    (8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 825 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 827 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Rover 800 MPG

      • average 1988 Rover 800 MPG: 26 MPG / 10.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1988 Rover 800 MPG: 18 MPG / 13.2 L per 100 km
      • best 1988 Rover 800 MPG: 31 MPG / 7.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1395 kg / 3076 lbs
      • body type: hatchback
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 138 kW / 188 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 431 miles (694 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Rover 800 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1988 Rover 800 MPG is between 18 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • 825 Si — 18 to 30 MPG
  • 820 Ti — 20 to 31 MPG

    1988 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 825 Si — 63 kg/mpg
  • 820 Ti — 58 kg/mpg

    1988 Rover 800 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Rover 800 MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 825 Si is 31% less economical than average car
  • 820 Ti is 25% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 1988 Rover 800 Hatchback MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    825 Si 18 / 30 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    820 Ti 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Rover 800 Hatchback MPG

    Vehicle 825 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 30 MPG
    (13.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 Ti
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.8 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Rover 800 MPG

      • average 1986 Rover 800 MPG: 29 MPG / 8.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1986 Rover 800 MPG: 19 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
      • best 1986 Rover 800 MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1425 kg / 3142 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 38%
      • average engine power: 114 kW / 154 hp
      • difference from world average: 9% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 661 miles (1063 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1986 Rover 800 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1986 Rover 800 MPG is between 19 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • 827 SI/Sterling — 19 to 32 MPG
  • 820 16 V I/SI — 21 to 39 MPG
  • 820 16V Turbo — 19 to 36 MPG
  • 820 I/SI — 25 to 36 MPG
  • 825 D/SD — 32 to 46 MPG
  • 825 Si Lux — 24 to 34 MPG

    1986 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1986 Rover 800 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 827 SI/Sterling — 54 kg/mpg
  • 820 16 V I/SI — 45 kg/mpg
  • 820 16V Turbo — 48 kg/mpg
  • 820 I/SI — 46 kg/mpg
  • 825 D/SD — 37 kg/mpg
  • 825 Si Lux — 53 kg/mpg

    1986 Rover 800 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1986 Rover 800 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 827 SI/Sterling is 19% less economical than average car
  • 820 16 V I/SI is 6% less economical than average car
  • 820 16V Turbo is 9% less economical than average car
  • 820 I/SI is 9% less economical than average car
  • 825 D/SD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 825 Si Lux is 16% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 1986 Rover 800 MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    827 SI/Sterling 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    820 16 V I/SI 21 / 39 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    820 16V Turbo 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    820 I/SI 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km / person
    825 D/SD 32 / 46 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.3 L per 100 km / person
    825 Si Lux 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1986 Rover 800 MPG

    Vehicle 827 SI/Sterling
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 32 MPG
    (12.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 16 V I/SI
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 39 MPG
    (11.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 16V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 820 I/SI
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 825 D/SD
    Consumption (city / highway) 32 / 46 MPG
    (7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 825 Si Lux
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person