2001 Rover 45 MPG is between 17 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Rover 45 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Rover 45 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i 16V |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i V6 24V |
17
/
35 MPG
(14 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
35 MPG
(14 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Rover 45 MPG is between 17 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Rover 45 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Rover 45 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i 16V |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i V6 24V |
17
/
35 MPG
(14 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TD |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
35 MPG
(14 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.2 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |