cat_logo
HomeRover

400

Rover 400 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Rover 400 MPG by Years

Rover 400 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Rover 400 MPG

    • average 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 35 MPG / 7.5 L per 100 km
    • worst 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 17 MPG / 14 L per 100 km
    • best 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 59 MPG / 4 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1350 kg / 2977 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 42%
    • average engine power: 88 kW / 119 hp
    • difference from world average: 9% better
    • max distance with full tank: 621 miles (1000 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

1995 Rover 400 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1995 Rover 400 MPG is between 17 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:

  • 416 Si — 25 to 46 MPG
  • 414 Si — 26 to 46 MPG
  • 420 D — 31 to 59 MPG
  • 420 Di — 42 to 51 MPG
  • 420 Si Lux — 18 to 39 MPG
  • 425 i — 17 to 29 MPG


    1995 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 416 Si — 33 kg/mpg
  • 414 Si — 31 kg/mpg
  • 420 D — 30 kg/mpg
  • 420 Di — 30 kg/mpg
  • 420 Si Lux — 42 kg/mpg
  • 425 i — 64 kg/mpg


    1995 Rover 400 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Rover 400 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.

  • 416 Si is 13% more economical than average car
  • 414 Si is 13% more economical than average car
  • 420 D is 28% more economical than average car
  • 420 Di is 34% more economical than average car
  • 420 Si Lux is 3% less economical than average car
  • 425 i is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Rover 400 (RT) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    416 Si 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    414 Si 26 / 46 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    420 D 31 / 59 MPG
    (7.5 / 4 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% better 435—870 miles
    (700—1400 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    420 Di 42 / 51 MPG
    (5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% better 621—746 miles
    (1000—1200 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    420 Si Lux 18 / 39 MPG
    (13 / 6 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    425 i 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Rover 400 (RT) MPG

    Vehicle 416 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 414 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 46 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 59 MPG
    (7.5 / 4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—870 miles (700—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 Di
    Consumption (city / highway) 42 / 51 MPG
    (5.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 Si Lux
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 39 MPG
    (13 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 425 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Rover 400 MPG

      • average 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 37 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 18 MPG / 13.1 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Rover 400 MPG: 59 MPG / 4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1120 kg / 2470 lbs
      • body type: hatchback
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 76 kW / 103 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% better
      • max distance with full tank: 670 miles (1078 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

    1995 Rover 400 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1995 Rover 400 MPG is between 18 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:

  • 414 Si — 25 to 46 MPG
  • 416 Si — 25 to 46 MPG
  • 420 D — 40 to 57 MPG
  • 420 Si Lux — 18 to 39 MPG
  • 420 Di — 42 to 59 MPG
  • 414 i — 24 to 33 MPG


    1995 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 414 Si — 31 kg/mpg
  • 416 Si — 33 kg/mpg
  • 420 D — 28 kg/mpg
  • 420 Si Lux — 51 kg/mpg
  • 420 Di — 28 kg/mpg
  • 414 i — 40 kg/mpg


    1995 Rover 400 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Rover 400 MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.

  • 414 Si is 13% more economical than average car
  • 416 Si is 13% more economical than average car
  • 420 D is 44% more economical than average car
  • 420 Si Lux is 22% less economical than average car
  • 420 Di is 34% more economical than average car
  • 414 i is 13% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Rover 400 Hatchback (RT) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    414 Si 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    416 Si 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    420 D 40 / 57 MPG
    (5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    420 Si Lux 18 / 39 MPG
    (13.1 / 6 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    420 Di 42 / 59 MPG
    (5.6 / 4 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% better 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    414 i 24 / 33 MPG
    (10 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Rover 400 Hatchback (RT) MPG

    Vehicle 414 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 416 Si
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 46 MPG
    (9.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 40 / 57 MPG
    (5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 Si Lux
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 39 MPG
    (13.1 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 Di
    Consumption (city / highway) 42 / 59 MPG
    (5.6 / 4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 414 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 33 MPG
    (10 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Rover 400 MPG

      • average 1994 Rover 400 MPG: 34 MPG / 7.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1994 Rover 400 MPG: 24 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • best 1994 Rover 400 MPG: 41 MPG / 5.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1210 kg / 2668 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 91 kW / 124 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% better
      • max distance with full tank: 432 miles (696 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1994 Rover 400 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1994 Rover 400 MPG is between 24 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • 1.6i — 24 to 41 MPG
  • 2.0 i — 26 to 37 MPG


    1994 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1994 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 1.6i — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 i — 42 kg/mpg


    1994 Rover 400 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1994 Rover 400 MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 1.6i is 6% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 i is 9% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1994 Rover 400 Tourer (XW) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    1.6i 24 / 41 MPG
    (10 / 5.8 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 i 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1994 Rover 400 Tourer (XW) MPG

    Vehicle 1.6i
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 41 MPG
    (10 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Rover 400 MPG

      • average 1990 Rover 400 MPG: 34 MPG / 7.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1990 Rover 400 MPG: 24 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • best 1990 Rover 400 MPG: 55 MPG / 4.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1220 kg / 2690 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 33%
      • average engine power: 87 kW / 118 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% better
      • max distance with full tank: 610 miles (982 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1990 Rover 400 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1990 Rover 400 MPG is between 24 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:

  • 416 GSI — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 414 GSI/SI CAT — 26 to 43 MPG
  • 416 GTI — 24 to 37 MPG
  • 418 D — 37 to 52 MPG
  • 418 TD — 36 to 55 MPG
  • 420 GSI/SLI/GTI/Vite — 26 to 37 MPG
  • 420 Turbo — 24 to 35 MPG


    1990 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1990 Rover 400 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 416 GSI — 41 kg/mpg
  • 414 GSI/SI CAT — 34 kg/mpg
  • 418 D — 27 kg/mpg
  • 418 TD — 30 kg/mpg
  • 420 GSI/SLI/GTI/Vite — 40 kg/mpg
  • 420 Turbo — 44 kg/mpg


    1990 Rover 400 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1990 Rover 400 MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.

  • 416 GSI is 19% less economical than average car
  • 414 GSI/SI CAT is 0% more economical than average car
  • 416 GTI is 13% less economical than average car
  • 418 D is 31% more economical than average car
  • 418 TD is 22% more economical than average car
  • 420 GSI/SLI/GTI/Vite is 9% less economical than average car
  • 420 Turbo is 13% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1990 Rover 400 (XW) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    416 GSI 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.8 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    414 GSI/SI CAT 26 / 43 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    416 GTI 24 / 37 MPG
    (10 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		- 13% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    418 D 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    418 TD 36 / 55 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    420 GSI/SLI/GTI/Vite 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    420 Turbo 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1990 Rover 400 (XW) MPG

    Vehicle 416 GSI
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.8 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 414 GSI/SI CAT
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 43 MPG
    (8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 416 GTI
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 37 MPG
    (10 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 418 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 52 MPG
    (6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 418 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 36 / 55 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 GSI/SLI/GTI/Vite
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 37 MPG
    (9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 420 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings