Rover 25 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Rover 25 MPG by Years

- average 2000 Rover 25 MPG: 36 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
- worst 2000 Rover 25 MPG: 23 MPG / 10.4 L per 100 km
- best 2000 Rover 25 MPG: 56 MPG / 4.2 L per 100 km
- body weight: 1130 kg / 2492 lbs
- body type: hatchback
- difference highway / city: 42%
- average engine power: 77 kW / 105 hp
- difference from world average: 13% better
- max distance with full tank: 485 miles (781 km)
- Fuelson rating: 10 / 10

2000 Rover 25 MPG is between 23 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:

1.4 i 16V — 27 to 44 MPG

1.1 i 16V — 27 to 43 MPG

1.6 i 16V — 26 to 44 MPG

1.8 i 16V — 23 to 41 MPG

2.0 TD — 31 to 56 MPG

The 2000 Rover 25 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

1.4 i 16V — 29 kg/mpg

1.1 i 16V — 31 kg/mpg

1.6 i 16V — 32 kg/mpg

1.8 i 16V — 35 kg/mpg

2.0 TD — 31 kg/mpg

We calculated that 2000 Rover 25 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

1.4 i 16V is 16% more economical than average car

1.1 i 16V is 3% more economical than average car

1.6 i 16V is 9% more economical than average car

1.8 i 16V is 3% less economical than average car

2.0 TD is 13% more economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
1.4 i 16V	27 / 44 MPG (8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km)	1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg	16% better	373—559 miles (600—900 km)	1.3 L per 100 km / person
1.1 i 16V	27 / 43 MPG (8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km)	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg	3% better	373—559 miles (600—900 km)	1.4 L per 100 km / person
1.6 i 16V	26 / 44 MPG (8.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg	9% better	373—559 miles (600—900 km)	1.3 L per 100 km / person
1.8 i 16V	23 / 41 MPG (10.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	3% worse	311—559 miles (500—900 km)	1.5 L per 100 km / person
2.0 TD	31 / 56 MPG (7.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km)	1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg	13% better	373—746 miles (600—1200 km)	1.3 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	1.4 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	27 / 44 MPG (8.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	16% better
Driving range (full tank)	373—559 miles (600—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.3 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.1 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	27 / 43 MPG (8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	3% better
Driving range (full tank)	373—559 miles (600—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.4 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.6 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	26 / 44 MPG (8.9 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	9% better
Driving range (full tank)	373—559 miles (600—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.3 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	1.8 i 16V
Consumption (city / highway)	23 / 41 MPG (10.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	3% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—559 miles (500—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.5 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	2.0 TD
Consumption (city / highway)	31 / 56 MPG (7.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	13% better
Driving range (full tank)	373—746 miles (600—1200 km)
Consumption per passenger	1.3 L per 100 km / person