1995 Rover 200 MPG is between 27 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Rover 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Rover 200 MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 Vi |
29
/
45 MPG
(8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
214 i |
30
/
47 MPG
(7.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
214 Si |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
216 Si |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
220 SDi |
39
/
59 MPG
(6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 200 Vi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 214 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
47 MPG
(7.8 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 214 Si |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216 Si |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 220 SDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
59 MPG
(6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Rover 200 MPG is between 21 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Rover 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Rover 200 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
216 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
216i |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
218i |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
220 Turbo |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
220i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 218i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 220 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 220i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Rover 200 MPG is between 25 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Rover 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Rover 200 MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
214 i |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
216i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 214 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Rover 200 MPG is between 21 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Rover 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Rover 200 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
214 GSi/Si |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
214 i |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
216 GTi |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
216 GSi |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
218 TD |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
220 GTi |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
220 Turbo |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 214 GSi/Si |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 214 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216 GTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 216 GSi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 218 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 220 GTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 220 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |