2018 Phantom VIII Extended Wheelbase
2018 Phantom VIII
2012 Phantom Coupe (facelift 2012)
2012 Phantom VII (facelift 2012)
2012 Phantom Extended Wheelbase VII (facelift 2012)
2012 Phantom Drophead Coupe (facelift 2012)
2008 Phantom Coupe
2007 Phantom Drophead Coupe
2003 Phantom VII
2003 Phantom VII Extended Wheelbase
2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
11
/
24 MPG
(21.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
-
|
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
24 MPG
(21.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
11
/
24 MPG
(21.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
-
|
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
24 MPG
(21.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
10
/
23 MPG
(23 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—621 miles
(400—1000 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
23 MPG
(23 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—621 miles (400—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 V12 |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
23 MPG
(22.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 21 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.75 i V12 |
10
/
21 MPG
(23.2 / 11.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
21 MPG
(23.2 / 11.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 21 MPG on engine:
The 2007 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.75 i V12 |
10
/
21 MPG
(24.6 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
186—435 miles
(300—700 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
21 MPG
(24.6 / 11 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—435 miles (300—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 20 MPG on engine:
The 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.75 i V12 48V |
10
/
20 MPG
(24.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 48V |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
20 MPG
(24.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is 20 MPG on engine:
The 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.75 i V12 48V |
10
/
20 MPG
(24.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 48V |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
20 MPG
(24.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
