2012 Renault Laguna MPG is between 16 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
32
/
48 MPG
(7.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
16
/
32 MPG
(15 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 dCi |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
48 MPG
(7.4 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
32 MPG
(15 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Renault Laguna MPG is between 23 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
43
/
57 MPG
(5.5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
746—994 miles
(1200—1600 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
GT 2.0 dCi |
43
/
57 MPG
(5.5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
746—994 miles
(1200—1600 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
47
/
60 MPG
(5 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
808—1056 miles
(1300—1700 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
57 MPG
(5.5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—994 miles (1200—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
57 MPG
(5.5 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—994 miles (1200—1600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
60 MPG
(5 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1056 miles (1300—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Renault Laguna MPG is between 23 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 dCi |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
746—1056 miles
(1200—1700 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
46
/
60 MPG
(5.1 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
808—1056 miles
(1300—1700 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1056 miles (1200—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
46
/
60 MPG
(5.1 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—1056 miles (1300—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Renault Laguna MPG is between 16 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V Turbo |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi FAP |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—746 miles
(600—1200 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 24V |
16
/
32 MPG
(15 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
42 MPG
(9.6 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—746 miles (600—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
32 MPG
(15 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Renault Laguna MPG is between 18 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi FAP |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V Turbo |
18
/
36 MPG
(13 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi FAP Turbo |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
36 MPG
(13 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Renault Laguna MPG is between 18 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,0 16V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
24
/
40 MPG
(10 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
38
/
51 MPG
(6.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V Turbo |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi FAP |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.8 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2,0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
40 MPG
(10 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
51 MPG
(6.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.8 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Renault Laguna MPG is between 16 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 dCi |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
41
/
56 MPG
(5.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
20
/
30 MPG
(12 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V GT |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i T 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 IDE 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
16
/
31 MPG
(15.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
56 MPG
(5.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
30 MPG
(12 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V GT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 IDE 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(15.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Renault Laguna MPG is between 16 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V Turbo |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V GT |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 IDE 16V |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i T 16V |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
16
/
32 MPG
(14.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
39 MPG
(11 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
49 MPG
(7.2 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V GT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 IDE 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i T 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
32 MPG
(14.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Renault Laguna MPG is between 15 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D |
36
/
52 MPG
(6.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dT |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.8 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 24V |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.2 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.6 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
52 MPG
(6.5 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.8 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(16.2 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.8 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Renault Laguna MPG is between 15 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Renault Laguna MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Renault Laguna MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 24V |
15
/
29 MPG
(16.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
33
/
51 MPG
(7.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D |
29
/
52 MPG
(8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—932 miles
(800—1500 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dT |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 RXE |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(16.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
51 MPG
(7.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
33 MPG
(12.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
52 MPG
(8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—932 miles (800—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
42 MPG
(9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 RXE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |