2013 Kangoo II (facelift 2013)
2013 Grand Kangoo II (facelift 2013)
2013 Kangoo II Express Maxi Grand Volume (facelift 2013)
2013 Kangoo II Express (facelift 2013)
2013 Kangoo II Express Compact (facelift 2013)
2012 Grand Kangoo II
2009 Kangoo Be Bop
2007 Kangoo II
2003 Kangoo I (KC, facelift 2003)
2003 Kangoo I Express (FC, facelift 2003)
1997 Kangoo I (KC)
1997 Kangoo I Express (FC)
2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 22 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 Energy TCe |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Energy dCi |
50
/
56 MPG
(4.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
808—870 miles
(1300—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
47
/
53 MPG
(5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
746—870 miles
(1200—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 Energy TCe |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Energy dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
56 MPG
(4.7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—870 miles (1300—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
53 MPG
(5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 44 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
44
/
55 MPG
(5.3 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Energy dCi |
48
/
55 MPG
(4.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
746—870 miles
(1200—1400 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
55 MPG
(5.3 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Energy dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
55 MPG
(4.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—870 miles (1200—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 39 MPG and 65 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 Energy dCi |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
746—1056 miles
(1200—1700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
39
/
56 MPG
(6 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Energy dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
65 MPG
(5.2 / 3.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1056 miles (1200—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
56 MPG
(6 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 32 MPG and 69 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Energy dCi |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
746—1118 miles
(1200—1800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 TCe |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 Energy TCe |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Energy dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1118 miles (1200—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 Energy TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.1 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is 69 MPG on engine:
The 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 Energy dCi |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
746—1118 miles
(1200—1800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Energy dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1118 miles (1200—1800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Renault Kangoo MPG is 47 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
37
/
47 MPG
(6.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
47 MPG
(6.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
37
/
44 MPG
(6.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—684 miles
(900—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
44 MPG
(6.4 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—684 miles (900—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 22 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
40
/
49 MPG
(5.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 8V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
49 MPG
(5.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 8V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.6 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 21 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 21 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
4 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 22 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.2i 16V |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
33
/
48 MPG
(7.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
48 MPG
(7.1 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Renault Kangoo MPG is between 22 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Renault Kangoo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Renault Kangoo MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.2i 16V |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i 16V |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.3 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |