2012 Renault Fluence MPG is between 26 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Renault Fluence MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Renault Fluence MPG is up to 60% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
42
/
59 MPG
(5.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 Energy dCi |
41
/
60 MPG
(5.7 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
59 MPG
(5.6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 Energy dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
60 MPG
(5.7 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Renault Fluence MPG is between 22 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Renault Fluence MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Renault Fluence MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
45
/
59 MPG
(5.2 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
746—932 miles
(1200—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
59 MPG
(5.2 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—932 miles (1200—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |