2020 Espace V (Phase I)
2015 Espace V
2012 Espace IV (Phase IV)
2012 Grand Espace IV (Phase IV)
2010 Espace IV (Phase III)
2010 Grand Espace IV (Phase III)
2006 Grand Espace IV (Phase II)
2006 Espace IV (Phase II)
2002 Espace IV
2002 Grand Espace IV
2000 Grand Espace III (JE, Phase II)
2000 Espace III (JE, Phase II)
1998 Grand Espace III (JE)
1996 Espace III (JE)
1991 Espace II (J63)
1988 Espace I (J11/13, Phase II 1988)
1984 Espace I (J11/13)
2020 Renault Espace MPG is between 24 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 2020 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Renault Espace MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TCe |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Blue dCi |
38
/
50 MPG
(6.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 TCe |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Blue dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
50 MPG
(6.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Renault Espace MPG is between 26 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Renault Espace MPG is up to 60% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 dCi |
47
/
53 MPG
(5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
746—808 miles
(1200—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 TCe |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Energy TCe |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Blue dCi |
38
/
50 MPG
(6.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 TCe |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
53 MPG
(5 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—808 miles (1200—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Energy TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Blue dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
50 MPG
(6.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Renault Espace MPG is between 21 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Renault Espace MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TCe |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Renault Espace MPG is between 21 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Renault Espace MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
746—1056 miles
(1200—1700 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TCe |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—1056 miles (1200—1700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.3 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Renault Espace MPG is between 20 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Renault Espace MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TCe |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.6 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.6 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Renault Espace MPG is between 20 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Renault Espace MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
621—932 miles
(1000—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TCe |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.6 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—932 miles (1000—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.6 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Renault Espace MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dCi |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TCe |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.4 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 dCi V6 |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.4 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Renault Espace MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dCi |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo 16V |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V |
18
/
31 MPG
(12.9 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 dCi |
28
/
37 MPG
(8.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 dCi V6 |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(12.9 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
37 MPG
(8.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(17.2 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Renault Espace MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo 16V |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.6 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 dCi |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5i V6 24V |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.6 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Renault Espace MPG is between 13 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Renault Espace MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo 16V |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 dCi V6 |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 V6 |
13
/
25 MPG
(17.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dCi |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.3 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(13.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
25 MPG
(17.5 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Renault Espace MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi 16V |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Renault Espace MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dTi |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi 16V |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 dCi |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.8 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Renault Espace MPG is between 14 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Renault Espace MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TD 12V |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Renault Espace MPG is between 11 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Renault Espace MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 dTi |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TD 12V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 24V |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
11
/
25 MPG
(21 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.8 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
32 MPG
(11.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.6 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.3 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
25 MPG
(21 / 9.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Renault Espace MPG is between 18 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Renault Espace MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 TD |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.3 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.5 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 V6 |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.3 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.5 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Renault Espace MPG is between 19 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Renault Espace MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GTS |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i TXE |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 TD |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i TXE |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTS |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i TXE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(11.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i TXE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
32 MPG
(12.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1984 Renault Espace MPG is between 22 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 1984 Renault Espace MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Renault Espace MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD |
33
/
46 MPG
(7.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GTS |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
46 MPG
(7.2 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |