1996 Renault 19 MPG is between 28 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Renault 19 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Renault 19 MPG is between 22 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Renault 19 MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.7i |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i s |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 DT |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i s |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 DT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Renault 19 MPG is between 22 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Renault 19 MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.7i |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i s |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 DT |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.7 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i s |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 DT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Renault 19 MPG is between 24 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Renault 19 MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i RSi |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i RSi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Renault 19 MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 1989 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Renault 19 MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Renault 19 MPG is between 28 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Renault 19 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Renault 19 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 |
29
/
35 MPG
(8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 3% worse |
-
|
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.5 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
35 MPG
(8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |