2013 Peugeot RCZ MPG is between 23 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Peugeot RCZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Peugeot RCZ MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 THP |
23
/
43 MPG
(10.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.0 HDi |
36
/
56 MPG
(6.5 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
| R 1.6 THP |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
43 MPG
(10.3 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
56 MPG
(6.5 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | R 1.6 THP |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Peugeot RCZ MPG is between 27 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Peugeot RCZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Peugeot RCZ MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 THP |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.8 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.0 HDI |
35
/
52 MPG
(6.8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
42 MPG
(8.8 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 3.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
52 MPG
(6.8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
