1994 Peugeot 806 MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Peugeot 806 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Peugeot 806 MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
17
/
27 MPG
(14.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDI |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 td 12V |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
27 MPG
(14.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 td 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |