1982 Peugeot 505 MPG is between 18 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1982 Peugeot 505 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1982 Peugeot 505 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 Diesel |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 Diesel |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1979 Peugeot 505 MPG is between 18 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1979 Peugeot 505 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1979 Peugeot 505 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 i |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 Diesel |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
32 MPG
(12.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 Diesel |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.3 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |