cat_logo
HomePeugeot

406

Peugeot 406 MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Peugeot 406 MPG by Years

Peugeot 406 MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Peugeot 406 MPG

    • average 1997 Peugeot 406 MPG: 27 MPG / 9.7 L per 100 km
    • worst 1997 Peugeot 406 MPG: 15 MPG / 15.9 L per 100 km
    • best 1997 Peugeot 406 MPG: 48 MPG / 4.9 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1410 kg / 3109 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 47%
    • average engine power: 121 kW / 165 hp
    • difference from world average: 16% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 680 miles (1094 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1997 Peugeot 406 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1997 Peugeot 406 MPG is between 15 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 24V — 15 to 29 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 2.2 16V — 18 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 16V — 20 to 36 MPG
  • 2.2 HDi — 27 to 48 MPG


    1997 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1997 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 24V — 73 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 68 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 16V — 59 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 16V — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 HDi — 38 kg/mpg


    1997 Peugeot 406 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1997 Peugeot 406 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 24V is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 16V is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 HDi is 16% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1997 Peugeot 406 Coupe (8) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 24V 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		3 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 17 / 31 MPG
    (14.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 16V 18 / 36 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—684 miles
    (500—1100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 16V 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 HDi 27 / 48 MPG
    (8.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1997 Peugeot 406 Coupe (8) MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.9 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (14.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 36 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—684 miles (500—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.6 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 HDi
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 48 MPG
    (8.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Peugeot 406 MPG

      • average 1996 Peugeot 406 MPG: 30 MPG / 8.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1996 Peugeot 406 MPG: 15 MPG / 16.1 L per 100 km
      • best 1996 Peugeot 406 MPG: 51 MPG / 4.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1460 kg / 3219 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 101 kW / 137 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 763 miles (1228 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1996 Peugeot 406 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1996 Peugeot 406 MPG is between 15 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 HDI FAP — 36 to 51 MPG
  • 3.0 24V — 15 to 29 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 17 to 32 MPG
  • 1.8 i 16V — 22 to 38 MPG
  • 1.8 16V — 19 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 16V — 20 to 36 MPG
  • 2.0 HDI 90 — 31 to 50 MPG
  • 2.0 HPi — 23 to 38 MPG
  • 2.0 Turbo — 17 to 31 MPG
  • 2.0 HDI 109 — 31 to 50 MPG
  • 2.2 16V — 18 to 35 MPG
  • 2.2 HDi — 27 to 46 MPG


    1996 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1996 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 HDI FAP — 37 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 24V — 81 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 68 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 i 16V — 49 kg/mpg
  • 1.8 16V — 47 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 16V — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 HDI 90 — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 HPi — 45 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Turbo — 70 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 HDI 109 — 37 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 16V — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 HDi — 41 kg/mpg


    1996 Peugeot 406 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1996 Peugeot 406 MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 HDI FAP is 28% more economical than average car
  • 3.0 24V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 i 16V is 13% less economical than average car
  • 1.8 16V is 13% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 HDI 90 is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 HPi is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 Turbo is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 HDI 109 is 22% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 16V is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 HDi is 13% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1996 Peugeot 406 Break (8) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 HDI FAP 36 / 51 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% better 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 24V 15 / 29 MPG
    (16.1 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 i 16V 22 / 38 MPG
    (10.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    1.8 16V 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 16V 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 HDI 90 31 / 50 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 559—932 miles
    (900—1500 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 HPi 23 / 38 MPG
    (10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Turbo 17 / 31 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 HDI 109 31 / 50 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% better 559—932 miles
    (900—1500 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 16V 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 HDi 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1996 Peugeot 406 Break (8) MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 HDI FAP
    Consumption (city / highway) 36 / 51 MPG
    (6.6 / 4.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (16.1 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 38 MPG
    (10.8 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 34 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 36 MPG
    (11.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 90
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 50 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—932 miles (900—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 HPi
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 38 MPG
    (10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (14.2 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 109
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 50 MPG
    (7.5 / 4.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—932 miles (900—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 HDi
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.8 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Peugeot 406 MPG

      • average 1995 Peugeot 406 MPG: 32 MPG / 7.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Peugeot 406 MPG: 17 MPG / 13.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Peugeot 406 MPG: 56 MPG / 4.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1370 kg / 3021 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 40%
      • average engine power: 92 kW / 126 hp
      • difference from world average: 0%
      • max distance with full tank: 791 miles (1273 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    1995 Peugeot 406 MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1995 Peugeot 406 MPG is between 17 MPG and 56 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 17 to 33 MPG
  • 1.6 — 26 to 38 MPG
  • 1.9 TD — 28 to 45 MPG
  • 2.0 — 18 to 34 MPG
  • 2.0 HDI 90 — 32 to 51 MPG
  • 2.0 HDI — 37 to 56 MPG
  • 2.0 HPi — 23 to 39 MPG
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 31 to 44 MPG
  • 2.2 HDi — 27 to 48 MPG
  • 2.2 16V — 18 to 35 MPG


    1995 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Peugeot 406 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 66 kg/mpg
  • 1.6 — 42 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 — 51 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 HDI 90 — 32 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 HPi — 43 kg/mpg
  • 2.1 TD 12V — 39 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 HDi — 38 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 16V — 53 kg/mpg


    1995 Peugeot 406 MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Peugeot 406 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 1.6 is 3% less economical than average car
  • 1.9 TD is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 is 19% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 HDI 90 is 31% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 HDI is 34% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 HPi is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.1 TD 12V is 13% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 HDi is 16% more economical than average car
  • 2.2 16V is 19% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Peugeot 406 (8) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    1.6 26 / 38 MPG
    (8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    1.9 TD 28 / 45 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		- 16% better 497—808 miles
    (800—1300 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 18 / 34 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 HDI 90 32 / 51 MPG
    (7.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% better 559—932 miles
    (900—1500 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 HDI 37 / 56 MPG
    (6.3 / 4.2 L per 100 km)     		- 34% better -
    		-
    2.0 HPi 23 / 39 MPG
    (10.3 / 6 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.1 TD 12V 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% better 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 HDi 27 / 48 MPG
    (8.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 16V 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Peugeot 406 (8) MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 38 MPG
    (8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 45 MPG
    (8.5 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—808 miles (800—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 34 MPG
    (12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI 90
    Consumption (city / highway) 32 / 51 MPG
    (7.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—932 miles (900—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 HDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 37 / 56 MPG
    (6.3 / 4.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 34% better
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger -
    Vehicle 2.0 HPi
    Consumption (city / highway) 23 / 39 MPG
    (10.3 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.1 TD 12V
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 HDi
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 48 MPG
    (8.8 / 4.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 35 MPG
    (12.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings