2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 19 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.2 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 20 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 HDi |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
33
/
52 MPG
(7.1 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(10 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
52 MPG
(7.1 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 19 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 HDi |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 HDi |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
37 MPG
(12.2 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 19 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
20
/
38 MPG
(11.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
4.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V RC |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
38 MPG
(11.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V RC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
35 MPG
(12.4 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
2002 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 20 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 2002 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2002 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16 V |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 HDI |
38
/
53 MPG
(6.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
33
/
52 MPG
(7.1 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16 V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.9 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
53 MPG
(6.2 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
52 MPG
(7.1 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Peugeot 307 MPG is between 22 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Peugeot 307 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Peugeot 307 MPG is up to 63% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 HDi |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 i 16V |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 HDi |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
34
/
56 MPG
(7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDI |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.5 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
59 MPG
(5.5 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
56 MPG
(7 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |