1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 17 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.8 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S16 |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.8 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S16 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(10 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 17 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
20
/
39 MPG
(11.6 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9d |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
17
/
36 MPG
(13.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDI |
34
/
53 MPG
(7 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
42 MPG
(9.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
39 MPG
(11.6 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
36 MPG
(13.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
53 MPG
(7 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 18 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.9 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
18
/
34 MPG
(13 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.9 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(13 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.8 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 18 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9d |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TDi |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.8 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 HDi |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
34 MPG
(12.8 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 23 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 ST |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 SL |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 SR |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 SRDT |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 SLD |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 ST |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 ST |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 SL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 SR |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 SRDT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 SLD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 ST |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 24 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Peugeot 306 MPG is between 20 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Peugeot 306 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Peugeot 306 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 D |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 DT |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S16 |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 XSi |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 DT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S16 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 XSi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |